Posts Tagged ‘Ingmar Bergman’

h1

filmmakers on filmmakers…

01/05/2012

using the outside voices…

by JASON BAILEY

1. Francois Truffaut on Michelangelo Antonioni:
“Antonioni is the only important director I have nothing good to say about. He bores me; he’s so solemn and humorless.”

2. Ingmar Bergman on Michelangelo Antonioni:
“Fellini, Kurosawa, and Bunuel move in the same field as Tarkovsky. Antonioni was on his way, but expired, suffocated by his own tediousness.”

3. Ingmar Berman on Orson Welles:
“For me he’s just a hoax. It’s empty. It’s not interesting. It’s dead. Citizen Kane, which I have a copy of — is all the critics’ darling, always at the top of every poll taken, but I think it’s a total bore. Above all, the performances are worthless. The amount of respect that movie’s got is absolutely unbelievable.”

4. Ingmar Bergman on Jean-Luc Godard:
“I’ve never gotten anything out of his movies. They have felt constructed, faux intellectual, and completely dead. Cinematographically uninteresting and infinitely boring. Godard is a fucking bore. He’s made his films for the critics. One of the movies, Masculin, Féminin, was shot here in Sweden. It was mind-numbingly boring.”

5. Orson Welles on Jean-Luc Godard:
“His gifts as a director are enormous. I just can’t take him very seriously as a thinker — and that’s where we seem to differ, because he does. His message is what he cares about these days, and, like most movie messages, it could be written on the head of a pin.”

6. Werner Herzog on Jean-Luc Godard:
“Someone like Jean-Luc Godard is for me intellectual counterfeit money when compared to a good kung-fu film.”

7. Jean-Luc Godard on Quentin Tarantino:
“Tarantino named his production company after one of my films. He’d have done better to give me some money.”

8. Harmony Korine on Quentin Tarantino:
“Quentin Tarantino seems to be too concerned with other films. I mean, about appropriating other movies, like in a blender. I think it’s, like, really funny at the time I’m seeing it, but then, I don’t know, there’s a void there. Some of the references are flat, just pop culture.”

9. Nick Broomfield on Quentin Tarantino:
“It’s like watching a schoolboy’s fantasy of violence and sex, which normally Quentin Tarantino would be wanking alone to in his bedroom while this mother is making his baked beans downstairs. Only this time he’s got Harvey Weinstein behind him and it’s on at a million screens.”

10. Spike Lee on Quentin Tarantino (and the “n-word” in his scripts):
“I’m not against the word, and I use it, but not excessively. And some people speak that way. But, Quentin is infatuated with that word. What does he want to be made — an honorary black man?”

11. Spike Lee on Tyler Perry:
“We got a black president, and we going back to Mantan Moreland and Sleep ‘n’ Eat?”

12. Tyler Perry on Spike Lee
“Spike can go straight to hell! You can print that… Spike needs to shut the hell up!”

13. Clint Eastwood on Spike Lee:
“A guy like him should shut his face.”14. Jacques Rivette on Stanley Kubrick:
“Kubrick is a machine, a mutant, a Martian. He has no human feeling whatsoever. But it’s great when the machine films other machines, as in 2001.”

15. Jacques Rivette on James Cameron (and Steven Spielberg):
“Cameron isn’t evil, he’s not an asshole like Spielberg. He wants to be the new De Mille. Unfortunately, he can’t direct his way out of a paper bag. “

16. Jean-Luc Godard on Steven Spielberg:
“I don’t know him personally. I don’t think his films are very good.”

17. Alex Cox on Steven Spielberg:
“Spielberg isn’t a filmmaker, he’s a confectioner.”

18. Tim Burton on Kevin Smith (after Smith jokingly accused Burton of stealing the ending of Planet of the Apes from a Smith comic book):
“Anyone who knows me knows I would never read a comic book. And I would especially never read anything created by Kevin Smith.”

19. Kevin Smith on Tim Burton (in response to “I would never read a comic book”):
“Which, to me, explains fucking Batman.”

20. Kevin Smith on Paul Thomas Anderson (specifically, Magnolia):
“I’ll never watch it again, but I will keep it. I’ll keep it right on my desk, as a constant reminder that a bloated sense of self-importance is the most unattractive quality in a person or their work.”

21. David Gordon Green on Kevin Smith:
“He kind of created a Special Olympics for film. They just kind of lowered the standard. I’m sure their parents are proud; it’s just nothing I care to buy a ticket for.”

22. Vincent Gallo on Spike Jonze:
“He’s the biggest fraud out there. If you bring him to a party he’s the least interesting person at the party, he’s the person who doesn’t know anything. He’s the person who doesn’t say anything funny, interesting, intelligent… He’s a pig piece of shit.”

23. Vincent Gallo on Martin Scorsese:
“I wouldn’t work for Martin Scorsese for $10 million. He hasn’t made a good film in 25 years. I would never work with an egomaniac has-been.”

24. Vincent Gallo on Sofia (and Francis Ford) Coppola:
“Sofia Coppola likes any guy who has what she wants. If she wants to be a photographer she’ll fuck a photographer. If she wants to be a filmmaker, she’ll fuck a filmmaker. She’s a parasite just like her fat, pig father was.”

25. Vincent Gallo on Abel Ferrara:
“Abel Ferrara was on so much crack when I did The Funeral, he was never on set. He was in my room trying to pick-pocket me.”

26. Werner Herzog on Abel Ferrara:
“I have no idea who Abel Ferrara is. But let him fight the windmills… I’ve never seen a film by him. I have no idea who he is. Is he Italian? Is he French? Who is he?”

27. David Cronenberg on M. Night Shymalan:
“I HATE that guy! Next question.”

28. Alan Parker on Peter Greenaway (specifically The Draughtsman’s Contact):
“A load of posturing poo-poo.”

29. Ken Russell on Sir Richard Attenborough:
“Sir Richard (‘I’m-going-to-attack-the-Establishment-fifty-years-after-it’s-dead’) Attenborough is guilty of caricature, a sense of righteous self-satisfaction, and repetition which all undermine the impact of the film.”

30. Uwe Boll on Michael Bay:
“I’m not a fucking retard like Michael Bay.”

(FLAVORPILL  12.31.11)

About these ads
h1

“MARKÉTA LAZAROVÁ”

02/05/2011

František Vláčil’s masterpiece

by PETER HAMES

Dawn breaks against a black and white snowscape and a party of wolves makes its way obliquely towards the camera. A hawk hovers above the marsh reeds and we note that it is linked to the hand of its master. The sombre photography and the images of hunters, both animal and human, establish the context of a harsh and predatory world.

This is the opening to František Vláčil‘s 13th-century epic Markéta Lazarová. It’s a film from the mid-1960s, and by no means a familiar title, yet some rank it as one of the best films ever made. In the Czech Republic, a poll of film professionals has ranked it as the best Czech film. That places it above the work of Miloš Forman, Jan Švankmajer, and Oscar-winning titles such as Ostře sledované vlaky (Closely Observed Trains) and Obchod na korze (A Shop on the High Street).

Adapted from a pre-war novel by the avant-garde writer, Vladislav Vančura, Vláčil’s film deals with the conflicts between the rival clans of the Kozlíks and the Lazars, and the doomed love affair between Mikoláš Kozlík and Markéta Lazarová. Interwoven with all this is an evocation of the conflict between Christianity and paganism.

Revealing the essence

Vláčil’s objectives run counter to the traditional historical film in which he felt he was “seeing contemporary people dressed up in historical costumes.” He sought instead to penetrate the psychology of the times. “People then were much more instinctive in their actions, and hence much more consistent. The controlling emotion was fear, and that brought its pressure to bear mainly at night. That is why some pagan customs stayed with man for such a long time.”

Not satisfied with a purely intellectual exercise, he took his cast and film team to the Šumava forest for two years. “There we lived like animals …lacking food, and dressed in rags. I wanted my actors to live their parts. Finally they did. And they loved me, because I gave them the opportunity to live the way they always wanted.”

While he was clearly influenced by models such as Ingmar Bergman’s Det Sjunde inseglet (The Seventh Seal, 1957) and Akira Kurosawa’s Shichinin no samurai (Seven Samurai, 1954), Vláčil’s ambitions reached further. Apart from authentic clothes, implements, and sets constructed by traditional methods, he drew on anthropological studies and used historical language. Like the original novel, he attempted to reveal the essence of human nature.

Despite its extended period of preparation and shooting, the film has the intensity of an almost instantaneous inspiration. The combination of an elliptical narrative with a visually rich and evocative style produces a powerful and fascinating film.

Dramatic scenes such as the attack on a Saxon count and his retinue, a battle filmed as hallucination, and scenes of sexual passion, contrast with rare episodes of repose. The story is complemented by powerful animal images—the raven, the snake, the deer, and the lamb—a poetic menagerie of hunters and hunted. The superstition of the werewolf, common at the time, hangs over the characters’ actions.

The part of Markéta Lazarová is played by the strikingly beautiful Slovak actress, Magda Vášáryová, who was once slated to play the lead role in Sophie’s Choice, but lost out to the better-known Meryl Streep. More recently, she has been Czechoslovak ambassador to Austria (1990-1992) and a candidate for the Slovak presidency (May 1999).

History and genre

Markéta Lazarová, finished in 1967, was Vláčil’s second historical film and he was soon to become a specialist in the genre. Ďáblova past (The Devil’s Trap)(1961), set during the counter-Reformation, dealt with the Jesuit persecutions and had already created a sense of history as present. The theme of Christianity vs paganism and the distorting effects of organised religion is again the subject of Údolí včel (Valley of the Bees, 1967), where the Czech hero is raised as a member of the Order of St Mary of Jerusalem (the Teutonic Knights).

In Adelheid (1969), he treats the subject of a Czech who inherits German property after the expulsions from the Sudetenland after the Second World War. The almost silent examination of his relationship with Adelheid, daughter of the former German owner and now his servant, provides a profound analysis of the human distortions caused by ideology.

Vláčil, who originally studied art history and aesthetics, reveals an intense interest in the power of the poetic image and, in this respect, his work has been compared with Tarkovsky. But Vláčil’s approach focuses on drama rather than reflection. As a student, he apparently drew Eisenstein’s Bronenosets Potëmkin (The Battleship Potemkin, 1925) frame by frame, and maintained this storyboarding technique in his own work.

The present seen through the past

His taste for composition—horses against landscape, castles against the sea—often attains a Wellesian epic grandeur. Yet, in Markéta Lazarová the wide screen composition is complemented by a battery of poetic, associational, and disruptive effects. The bardic titles that break up the film give it the epic quality of the picaresque novel and the violence of the film’s rapid forward tracking movements, flashbacks and flashforwards disturb both narrative and visual convention.

Although Vláčil was temperamentally drawn to historical reconstruction, his films were always intended, he said, as a dialogue with his own times. His themes can be summarised as reflecting the human distortions caused by cultural and ideological conflict. The historical themes of East vs West, Christianity vs paganism, and Czechs vs Germans could easily find their parallels in more contemporary ideological conflicts. The invading Ukrainian guerrillas in Stíny horkého léta (Shadows of a Hot Summer, 1977), where a Moravian farmer defends his home against occupation, were even interpreted as standing for the Warsaw Pact armies that invaded Czechoslovakia during the suppression of the Prague Spring of 1968.

While he was initially unable to work in features immediately after 1968, Vláčil returned with Dým bramborové natě (Smoke on the Potato Fields, 1976), a reflective and elegiac study of a country doctor and his relations with a young pregnant girl. By holding to simple (but resonant) themes, he was able to maintain the integrity of his work in the difficult years that followed.

He inevitably projected his own and his society’s preoccupations into the past. But his attempts to see historical periods, including the post-war years, in terms of their own values and contradictions, is still rarely attempted.

(CE-REVIEW  16.10.00)

“MARKÉTA LAZAROVÁ” 1967 directed by František Vláčil

h1

INGMAR BERGMAN…

09/10/2010

that the term “Bergmanesque” describes stories of a world abandoned by God, it figures Woody Allen would call Ingmar “probably the greatest film artist, all things considered, since the invention of the motion picture camera” — beginning tonight, LACMA will be presenting a series of his work…

from LACMA

Ingmar Bergman is a towering figure in post-war European culture, best known internationally for the more than 60 dramas he wrote and directed for film and television between 1948 and 2003. In his native Sweden he is equally revered as a powerful stage director whose life-long position at the Royal Dramatic Theater in Stockholm provided him with a creative outlet between films, and access to such legendary actors as Max von Sydow, Bibi Andersson, Ingrid Thulin, Erland Josephson, and Liv Ullmann, all of whom appeared in ten or more Bergman films. Though a self-proclaimed intellectual who craved solitude—from 1960 on, the remote island of Fårö served as his spiritual retreat, the setting for several films including Persona, and in 2007, his final resting place—Bergman was also Sweden’s preeminent celebrity for decades. Never a recluse, he forged close friendships with great writers and cinematographers, had affairs with glamorous actresses, married six times and fathered nine children, wrote several successful autobiographies and articles on film theory, and gave frequent television and print interviews. Turning to television in the early 70s, he put the emotional lives of middle-class Swedes under the microscope in several mini-series (e.g. the six-hour Scenes from a Marriage) that brought him renewed acclaim and his largest audiences to date. Though he was at times an outspoken and controversial figure in the eyes of his fellow citizens—some resented his films for fueling clichés about Sweden, and many were disappointed by his public and acrimonious dispute over taxes and four year exile in Germany—Bergman never faltered as an artist. With the release of Fanny and Alexander in 1983, he painted a sweeping and lavish portrait of bourgeois Swedish life at the turn of the century, inspired by true events in his mother’s family history as seen through the eyes of a young boy, and officially retired from filmmaking.

The son of a Lutheran minister, Bergman pursued his great subject-the plight of humanity in a modern world cut loose from the pillars of religion and morality—with evangelical zeal, mining his own traumas, obsessions and family history for original material. The result was a stream of psychodramas that emerged over the years like chapters in an epic tale or panels in a fresco. Although his screenplays are enriched by the influence of theatrical giants like Strindberg and Shakespeare, images not words drive Bergman’s work, and his powerful visual style is a unique blend of expressionist lighting, the human face photographed in extreme close-ups, and shots of inanimate objects, like clocks, that are charged with a symbolic meaning. Bergman’s films have always been admired and distinguished by their detailed rendering of the physical world, but as a painter of dreamscapes, Bergman shows his imaginative genius. No other filmmaker is as skilled at exploring the cries and whispers that lie behind the mask of civilized behavior.

the series opens tonight with screenings of “PERSONA” and “CRIES AND WHISPERS”

“Cries and Whispers: The Psychological Cinema of Ingmar Bergman”  9.10 – 18 — for more information go to LACMA

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: